Yes, the Fuji 56mm f/1.2 is a sharp lens with a crazy good bokeh. But it is also a lens that can be very frustrating: the autofocus is much slower than anything on the market from Canon, Sony, Nikon, Panasonic (for the same telephoto range) and, hell, even Fuji with the 50mm f/2.0 and the new 50mm f/1.0 has better options.

The Sigma 56mm has insanely high-contrast at its wide open. On the other hand, Fuji 56mm struggles from f/1.2 to 2.0. When stopped down to f/2.8 - 4.0 the Fuji 56mm finally catch up with Sigma, but I can clearly say Sigma produces better color in wide apertures. f/1.4 Comparison: Sigma 56mm has contrast is outstanding.

0 Comments. The Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 is available for pre-order now, and one of the big questions is: how does it compare to the good old Fujinon XF56mmf/1.2? Well, down below you can see the first size and image quality comparison that surfaced on the web and a FR-reader sent me. Please note: Fujifilm (富士) is on the left and Viltrox
Fuji XF 90mm f/2 vs. XF 56mm f/1.2 . From time to time I consider swapping my XF 90mm for an XF 56mm f/1.2 R. The XF 56mm is of an older lens design and autofocus ability may be its weakest point. It is, however, a wonderful focal length for portrait photography, and the lens renders beautiful images. Ideally, you would have both.
The Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 R WR is a fast mid-telephoto prime lens for Fujifilm's X-series range of APS-C format mirrorless cameras. It replaces the original XF 56mm F1.2 R lens, which was first released back in 2014, offering several significant upgrades including weather-resistance, closer minimum focusing distance, more aperture blades for I could never pull the trigger on the Fujinon XF 56mm f/1.2 R lens at $999, but my experience with the Viltrox AF 23mm f/1.4 has convinced me they are on to a winning formula in the lower-priced . 57 90 54 498 357 263 97 36

fuji 56mm f1 2 review